Academia has an ambivalent relationship with rankings. Academics complain constantly about them; yet, they always look for ways to “fix” them. Higher education scholars researching rankings often also exhibit a similar kind of ambivalence. The author argues that this ambivalence contributes to the further entrenchment of rankings as a practice in higher education, and calls for a heightened appreciation of reflexivity in research on this subject.
The document is publicly available on the WWW.