Anslinger, Julian: Measurement and Evaluation of Sexual Objectification. 2019
Inhalt
- Introduction
- Empirical Part I: Development and Validation of the Sexual Objectification of Others Inventory (SOOI), an Instrument to Measure the Proclivity to Sexually Objectify Others
- General Introduction
- Current scales to measure the sexual objectification of others.
- Conceptual approach toward the Sexual Objectification of Others Inventory.
- Study 1 and Study 2: Development, Validation, and Assessment of the SOOI’s Test-Retest Reliability
- Method.
- Scale development.
- Item generation.
- Analyses of the initial item pool – Pretest 1.
- Analyses of the revised item pool – Pretest 2.
- Final scale refinement – reducing gender differences.
- Participants of Study 1.
- Participants of Study 2.
- Measures of Study 1.
- Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression Scale (AMMSA).
- Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI).
- Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Perpetration Measure (ISOS-P).
- Likelihood to Sexually Harass (LSH).
- Male Privilege Awareness (MPA).
- Motivation to Respond Without Sexism (IMS/EMS).
- Self-Objectification Questionnaire and Other-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ/OOQ).
- Sexual Orientation.
- Social Dominance Orientation (SDO).
- Sociosexual Orientation (SOI).
- Internal consistencies of the measures in Study 1.
- Measures of Study 2.
- Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR).
- Desire for Sex (DFS).
- Interest in Sex Robots (ISR).
- Sexual Harassment Myth Acceptance (ISHMA).
- Objectifying Word Positivity Index (OWPI).
- Internal consistencies of the measures in Study 2.
- Procedure of Study 1.
- Procedure of Study 2.
- Preparations for factor analyses.
- Results.
- Exploratory factor analyses.
- Confirmatory factor analyses.
- Descriptive statistics and gender comparison.
- Correlational analyses of the factor models and subfactors.
- Reliability analyses.
- Validity analyses.
- Discussion.
- Study 3: Applying the SOOI to People who Identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans or Queer*
- Method.
- Participants.
- Measures.
- Sexual Objectification of Others Inventory (SOOI).
- Sexual Orientation.
- Sociosexual Orientation (SOI).
- Identification with the different parts of the LGBTQ initialism.
- Further scales.
- Procedure.
- Results.
- Confirmatory factor analysis.
- Descriptive statistics and comparison of means.
- Correlational analyses.
- Discussion.
- Study 4: Validation of an English SOOI Version
- Method.
- Participants.
- Measures.
- Curran Objectification Measure (COM).
- Sexual Objectification of Others Inventory (SOOI).
- Internal consistencies for each scale.
- Procedure.
- Results.
- Discussion.
- Study 5: Sexual Objectification as Means to Palliate Masculinity Threat
- Introduction.
- Method.
- Participants and Design.
- Pretests.
- Measures.
- Behavioral Objectification: Attribute Ranking Task (BO-A).
- Behavioral Objectification: Photo Selection Task (BO-P).
- Implicit dehumanization and implicit objectification.
- Masculinity Contingency Scale (MCS).
- Sociosexual Orientation Revised (SOI-R).
- Further scales.
- Reliability indices for each measure.
- Experimental manipulation: masculinity threat and confirmation.
- Procedure.
- Results.
- Discussion.
- General Discussion of Empirical Part I
- Empirical Part II: Sexual Objectification in the Eyes of Observers
- General Introduction
- Study 1
- Introduction.
- Power.
- Fundamental content of social judgments: warmth and competence.
- Backlash Effects—a plausible reason for gender differences in sexually objectifying behavior?
- Method.
- Participants.
- Cover story.
- Design.
- Text vignettes.
- Measures.
- Sense of Power Scale.
- Warmth and competence.
- Social Distance Scale.
- Social Dominance Orientation.
- Ambivalent Sexism Inventory.
- Internal consistencies.
- Time difference scores.
- Procedure.
- Results.
- Discussion.
- Summary and conclusion.
- Study 2
- Introduction.
- Investigating sexual objectification and sexual harassment.
- Extending and replicating: power, ethical assessment, and stereotype content.
- Method.
- Participants.
- Cover story.
- Design.
- Text vignettes.
- Measures.
- Sense of Power Scale.
- Recognition as an Ethical Issue.
- Negative Sanctioning.
- Additional scales.
- Internal consistencies.
- Procedure.
- Results.
- Discussion.
- Summary and conclusion.
- Study 3
- General Discussion of Empirical Part II
- Final Conclusion
- References
- Appendices
